American Alpine Jounrna and Accidents in North American Climbing

Climber's Guide to Yosemite Valley

  • Book Reviews
  • Climb Year:
  • Publication Year: 1972

Climber’s Guide to Yosemite Valley, by Steve Roper. San Francisco: Sierra Club, 1971. 305 pages, 16 photographs, $6.95 This is a textbook example of how a guidebook should be done. It is without a doubt the finest guidebook in America. Roper has carefully rewritten even most of the older route descriptions, making them more accurate, readable, and concise. The new “Totebook” format allows the addition and removal of pages by means of two screwposts in the binding. Future revisions may be loose-leaf fillers at more frequent intervals.

Unlike many guidebooks, the introduction is entertaining, excellent prose. Subjects such as climbing history, life in the Valley, equipment, safety, names, and rating systems are all evaluated by Roper’s acrid and able pen. Under “Life in the Valley” we read:

“Second only to the Curry Company as a hostile force, the bears are at least predictable. During the lean months these omnivora roam freely through the campgrounds, devouring everything edible in their path and creating panic among the uninitiated. Cars are broken into, tents containing no food are destroyed, and tourists flee. The facile bears rule the campgrounds.”

Under rating systems, he is succinct:

“Idealistically, an international rating system is as desirable as Esperanto; a fine, doomed idea.”

Now that the multi-day climbs of the past are being climbed faster, by means of less direct aid, more knowledge of the route, and advanced technique and equipment, Roper has made a conscious effort to lower the grade ratings of a large proportion of the routes. While this tends to separate climbs in the upper grades, it clogs the lower grades into a confused mass of unequals. For example, Grade II’s now include a four-pitch climb with leads from 5.8-5.10, and another that is a two-hour unroped scramble from the trail. Consistently, the gradings are mainly according to time of average ascent, which seems to contradict Roper’s own introduction that states, “The Grades I-IV take into consideration length, average difficulty, continuity, exposure, commitment, and other, more subtle factors.” It remains to be seen whether the rest of the country will recognize the new gradings by following suit. Oh well, there’s always the UIAA.

While a few may mourn the loss of the historical action photos from the first edition, the new informational and well-marked pictures are far more useful. In fact, it is often easier to find a route by a dot on one of these photos than by adjectives which popped out of Roper’s head in the course of a winter evening in Berkeley.

The professional consistency and meticulous research make this guide a pleasure to peruse. It’s few faults seem to be inherent in all guidebooks and only prove that no number of words can ever substitute for sound mountaineering judgment.


This AAJ article has been reformatted into HTML. Please contact us if you spot an error.